Do Krishna Cults Brainwash Their Members?: A Moral Psychology Perspective December 22, 2015 By: gaurarader 4 The short answer is: Yes, and no. People, and you might be one of them, assume that Krishna religions are not cults because the followers are clearly not brainwashed. They can clearly articulate their beliefs, they can defend them vehemently against criticism. In short they are able to think critically about their beliefs and if you speak with them it becomes clear they chose to believe everything they believe. You might believe that about yourself. And further you might believe that if a religion doesn’t brainwash its members then it is not a cult. The truth is a bit more complicated than the above analysis indicates. It is true that Krishna cult members can articulately defend their beliefs, and in that sense they are not brainwashed. But there is no such thing as brainwashing. The term originally referred to prisoners returning from the Korean war who had supposedly been brainwashed into accepting communism and hating America. It turns out there were two distinct phenomena at play. Some prisoners didn’t believe what they were saying to their captors but just told them what they wanted to hear so they wouldn’t be subjected to torture. Some of the prisoner genuinely did believe that communism was superior to capitalism and that the United States was evil for participating in the war, but these people were liberals who already believed those things before they were captured. So, “brainwashing” isn’t a real phenomena. But people do come to believe very strange things, so how does that happen? To understand what happens to someone when they join a cult, or more broadly any group with a moral or political message one needs to understand a little moral psychology. The perspective I offer here is a bit different than standard interpretations of cult groups and how people come to be indoctrinated into new belief systems by cults. I highly recommend Jonathan Haidt’s The Righteous Mind as great moral psychology primer and one of the most powerful books you could possibly read if you are interested in understanding the morality, religion, politics, and humanity itself. People join religious or political organizations for any number of reasons. Some are even genetic in that there is a genetic predisposition to liberalism, conservatism, and libertarianism. Often times with religious cults people are going through an identity crises or a particularly difficult time in their life. Or they are just on a search for the truth, although often times that is probably a sort of identity crises. Anyhow, a person finds themselves part of a moral community, whether it is religious or political it doesn’t matter. Once a person is a part of a community our psychology, beautifully designed by evolution, essentially turns off our rational thinking, as it applies to whether beliefs of the group are true or not. All rational thinking is dedicated not to evaluating the truth of the beliefs fo the group but to proving the beliefs to be true and proving all other beliefs to be false. And also of course to hating everyone outside the group and loving everyone in the group. A moment’s reflection on this should make it obvious why this psychological feature is useful. When you are about to go to war with the neighboring tribe it is not useful to be thinking about how maybe your tribe is wrong in the dispute and how your tribe is being greedy. They are the one’s that are being greedy, they are wrong, they deserve to die and rot in hell eternally. Kill’em! Human beings are tribal creatures and morality, to use Haidt’s term, serves a two-fold purpose in “blinds and binds” us. It blinds us to moral truths outside the truths of our group and it binds us together with other members of group. So, given that “brainwashing” is a red herring, what useful questions might we ask regarding whether a group is a cult. One of the most useful things we can do is look at recruiting tactics of groups. If a group goes after lonely, vulnerable, isolated, idealistic, naive, young people then I think it is fair to say the group is a cult. Because once a person joins a religious group a person’s own moral psychology will do the rest of the work. The trick is just getting them to join. Cults, of course, have other features. Cults harm people, either their own members, outsiders, or both. Cults indoctrinate their members into an extremely distorted view of reality. They get their members to make insane sacrifices for the sake of the leader or the group. They have leaders whom the members must submit to. Etc. etc. Another useful question when thinking about whether an individual is “brainwashed,” is to look at their beliefs. Cults get people to believe very, very strange things. Science and philosophy, or reason, can help us figure out what we should believe. Not all belief systems are equal. Some beliefs systems are almost entirely irrational (cultic religious belief), some are mostly rational (non-cult moderate religious belief), and some are entirely rational. If your group is on the wrong end of that spectrum you are probably in a cult of sorts. Krishna cults don’t brainwash their members in the pop culture mind control sense of the word “brainwash,” but they do use dubious tactics to bring in new members who are then indoctrinated into believing very strange things, and from there an individual’s moral psychology takes over inhibiting rational evaluation of the groups practices and beliefs. That being said, if we consider standard definitions of what makes a cult, which while being a little simplistic in their understanding of moral psychology can be useful, then clearly Krishna cults fit the bill. Krishna cults involve veneration of specific people, they use emotional manipulation and deception as part of their recruiting tactics, and the worldview they indoctrinate members into has all the telltale signs of a cult worldview. (Here is a simple answer to the question “What makes a cult?” by Rick Ross with links to Robert Jay Lifton’s important work on cults and thought reform.) Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Related Previous post On Leaving ISKCON by Steven J. Gelberg Next post Why You Should Care About Cults by Eigener Herr 4 Comments Nemi: One good thing about the Krsna Cult, is that it is no where as corrupt as christianity or Islam. There are no murderous missionaries going out to perform cultural genocide on unsuspecting people, or conversions, or bloodshed. As long as people followers follow the true teachings of the founding guru, people will actually become happy with themselves, their environment and do more to help others find the same, and that is by no means a bad thing. One thing to be weary of though is that in a fast growing peaceful organisation, that poses a threat to other political organisations, there are some nitwits who do bad things to intentionally bring disgrace, and stir up controversy as much as there are those who become fundamentalists and those who also become actors and conductors of blasphemy. Fortunately, there is the Almighty, who knows all intent. So no one can escape the consequences of their actions. November 20, 2017 - 12:04 pm Reply OneMind: Of course, KC is a treat to everyone, but mostly yourself. Physical harm involved by doing unnecessary austerities with your body, rational and emotional harm by suddenly leaving you previous life, and everything on which you built your previous relations and career. KC does not perform genocide. Wikipedia: Genocide is intentional action to destroy a people (usually defined as an ethnic, national, racial, or religious group) in whole or in part. Think twice again. Yes, KC performs genocide, indirectly. By convincing you to destroy your life in whole or in part, by your own self, a self-genocide. And which then destroys life of everyone around you. KC is a great danger to the society. The proof is found in the scriptures themselves: “In order to deliver the pious and to annihilate the miscreants, as well as to reestablish the principles of religion, I advent Myself millennium after millennium.” (BG 4.8) A religious war promoted in Bhagavad-gita. The specific words for non-believers used are, “to annihilate the miscreants.” In the whole Bhagavad-gita, Krishna advises Arjuna to get up and fight. Does this show how peaceful organization KC makes any difference than other religions and cults? August 15, 2018 - 7:15 am Reply Paul T. Harrison: So true….. even the language is militaristic Temple “commander” instead of “coordinator” for example, and the list goes on. Most devotees are pro war, and whatever Krishna says, they will do without much questioning….. Krishna says fight in the battle, they do it….. Krishna says kill an animal before battle, they do it….. They admit that if Krishna says offer meat they would and that is not being a pure vegetarian…… There is value in Iskcon, however after the “Krishna effects” completely an utterly failed with the first generation of devotee leaders, and with the bogus dishonest talking points currently used by Iskcon, YES it is dangerous….. Not that the devotees are bad people, but they have been mentally compromised for the most part. Msot devotees do not believe it because they never stop to actually consider what they are proposing as truth and how horrific it is …. and how immoral compared to modern standards. even as bad as the world still is…..it was worse before….. May 5, 2019 - 6:56 am Reply OneMind: Temple “commander”. That is a good one. And the most interesting part is when the “commander” asks you, “prabhuji, can you…”, and “prabhuji” says, “yes, prabhu, I can”. So, yes, it is not such a bad thing, but sometimes looks funny like in a circus. But that is another thing, as there must be hierarchical organisation in the temple, because discipline is expected there. But no one forces anyone to come and join the temple. That is an individual matter and preference. It is mostly for the militaristic type of devotees (those in passion), where individualism and personal consideration is subdued for the greater cause. Living in a temple is a type of fast-paced austerity in which you can be rewarded at some time, and gain more insight in self-realization which is hard to get otherwise if you are searching for the truth. May 5, 2019 - 7:36 am Reply Leave a Reply to Paul T. Harrison Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Name * Email * Website Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email.